Menu Note


Use the menu below if you'd like to search for posts that relate to your interests. Note - this was just created on 12-30-20 so I will need to link the posts in the coming weeks. Until then, you can scroll down to the labels on the right to find the same information.


Monday, April 17, 2017

Why Not Bunt?

I saw the first inning of the Cubs-Brewers game tonight.  The lead-off hitter for the Cubs bunted his way onto first base.  I didn't think much about it again until reading this day in baseball history.

Jackie Robinson got his first career hit on this day in 1947 - by bunting.  For the season he had 19 hits via the bunt in 42 attempts.  That's an average of .452.  It doesn't seem like a big difference, but without those at-bats he was hitting .285.  If he hit at a .285 clip for the other 42 at-bats that would have given him 12 hits.  By bunting he had 19.  Makes sense to keep doing that.

Check out this article about bunting with the bases empty -

http://www.beyondtheboxscore.com/2012/12/10/3748738/best-bunter-all-time-career-bunt-hits-bases-empty-mlb


Some names on the lists will surprise you.  Not many names from the last 20 years since bunting has changed a lot in the game.



3 comments:

  1. I've always been a pretty big fan of bunting for a hit when the situation dictates it (third baseman playing back, slow pitcher, etc). As a coach and a player, if I get a lead off guy on second, it's automatic to bunt him over. Same for first and second with no outs. But bunting for a hit is a very under rated in my opinion, especially in the MLB

    ReplyDelete
  2. I always liked the lefty using the drag bunt.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Damn... Lee Mazill was the man. Thought I knew me some Garvey... but didn't realize he was such an amazing bunter.

    ReplyDelete